首页> 外文OA文献 >Bronchoscopic diagnosis of pulmonary infiltrates in granulocytopenic patients with hematologic malignancies: BAL versus PSB and PBAL
【2h】

Bronchoscopic diagnosis of pulmonary infiltrates in granulocytopenic patients with hematologic malignancies: BAL versus PSB and PBAL

机译:支气管镜检查对血细胞减少性恶性血液病患者的肺浸润的诊断:BAL vs PSB和PBAL

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies is often complicated by severe respiratory infections. Bronchoscopy is generally to be used as a diagnostic tool in order to find a causative pathogen. Objectives: In a prospective study the combination of protected specimen brush (PSB) and protected bronchoalveolar lavage (PBAL) was compared with bronchoal-veolar lavage (BAL) for evaluated feasibility and diagnostic yield in granulocytopenic patients with hematologic malignancies and pulmonary infiltrates. Methods: All. specimens from 63 bronchoscopic procedures (35 BAL and 28 PSB-PBAL) were investigated by cytological examination and various microbiological, tests. If clinically relevant and feasible, based on the clinical condition and/or the presence of thrombocytopenia, lung tissue samples were obtained. Results: The majority of the 58 included patients were diagnosed as having acute myeloid leukaemia and developed a severe neutropenia (BAL-group: 27 days; PSB-PBAL group: 30 days). Microbiological and cytological examination of 63 bronchoscopic procedures (35 BAL and 28 PSB-PBAL) yielded causative pathogens in 9 (26%) patients of the BAL-group and 8 (29%) patients of the PSB-PBAL group (PSB and PBAL 4 each). Aspergillus fumigatus was the pathogen most frequently (13%) detected. Using all available examinations including the results of autopsy, a presumptive diagnosis was established in 43% of the patients in the BAL group and 57% of those in the PSB-PBAL group; in these cases microbial aetiology was correctly identified in 67% and 57%, respectively. The complication rate was of these procedures were tow, and none of the patients experienced serious complications due to the invasive techniques. Conclusions: Our results showed that modern bronchoscopic techniques such as PSB and PBAL did not yield better diagnostic results compared to BAL in granutocytopenic patients with hematologic malignancies and pulmonary infiltrates. In approximately half of the cases a presumptive diagnosis was made by bronchoscopic procedures. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:背景:血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的治疗通常会伴有严重的呼吸道感染。为了发现病原体,通常将支气管镜检查用作诊断工具。目的:在一项前瞻性研究中,比较了保护性标本刷(PSB)和保护性支气管肺泡灌洗(PBAL)与支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)的组合,以评估在患有血液系统恶性肿瘤和肺部浸润的粒细胞减少患者中的可行性和诊断率。方法:全部。通过细胞学检查和各种微生物学检查,对63种支气管镜检查方法(35 BAL和28 PSB-PBAL)的标本进行了调查。如果临床相关且可行,则根据临床状况和/或血小板减少症的存在,获得肺组织样品。结果:58名患者中的大多数被诊断为患有急性髓性白血病并发展为严重的中性粒细胞减少(BAL组:27天; PSB-PBAL组:30天)。对63例支气管镜手术(35个BAL和28个PSB-PBAL)进行了微生物学和细胞学检查,结果发现BAL组的9名患者(占26%)和PSB-PBAL的8名患者(占29%)(PSB和PBAL 4)产生致病性病原体每)。烟曲霉是最常见的病原体(13%)。使用包括尸检结果在内的所有可用检查,对BAL组的43%和PSB-PBAL组的57%的患者进行了推定性诊断。在这些情况下,正确识别微生物病因的比例分别为67%和57%。这些手术的并发症发生率是拖曳的,并且由于侵入性技术,没有患者发生严重的并发症。结论:我们的结果表明,对于患有血液系统恶性肿瘤和肺部浸润的粒细胞减少患者,现代支气管镜技术(如PSB和PBAL)与BAL相比,没有产生更好的诊断结果。在大约一半的病例中,通过支气管镜检查法做出了推定性诊断。 (c)2006 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号